I love it when Ric Masten socks me and every other reader right in the kisser with the notion that we are all stark naked. Period. Well, not exactly -- he doesn’t use periods. Or capital letters or sesquipedalianisms. “That’s all?” we ask, “That’s the whole poem?” It leaves us hanging, makes us want to cover ourselves, makes us want to hear it again. Maybe next time we’ll get some insight to cover ourselves with. Not to mention the underdressed poet!
But that’s all there is: we’re all on the same bus; we’re all naked. There’s really no dressing that up. And that stark and naked simplicity and directness, that short and not so sweet abruptness, are the genius of Ric Masten’s poetry. He puts us into a moment and leaves us standing there chuckling or puzzling or ... Or something. He demands a response. He leads us into some innocuous occurrence and drops us there to fend for ourselves, to see what he is seeing or saying. Or not. No one can say, “I don’t understand it.” No one can claim, “I don’t know what that means.” The only questions that can be asked are things like: Is that all there is? Why did he write that? What makes that a poem?
I love that.
To read the rest of this essay, click the "read more" link below!
I want to ask those questions about every poem. And I have been replaying that six-line scene on the bus in the poetry highlight reels of my brain for -- my god -- over twenty years and asking them again and again. It may be the only complete poem I can recite from memory.
I am an inveterate critic of elitism and, alas, something of a closet elitist. I love it when I see pictures of Ric Masten wearing Salvation Army used clothes and looking all disheveled. And uncool. I love it when I read about his broken down old cars and his broken down old body. I drive a new Honda Civic and wouldn’t be caught dead in a twenty-year-old flowery wide-collared shirt with the top three buttons missing. I work out at the neighborhood Y. And, to my shame, I must confess: I would do anything to stay away from Wal-Mart on a busy Saturday morning and, still worse, I don’t exactly feel comfortable riding a city bus.
But wait. Before we go any farther, I have to say this. I met Ric Masten once, spent an afternoon with him and some kindred spirits maybe twenty-five years ago. He played his guitar and sang and read some poetry, but mostly we talked. Five or six of us. All afternoon. It’s not much of a connection, but, because of it and because this is a personal essay, I am going to call him Ric. There. I’ve said it. I know people who know him well enough to call him Ric, and when I’m not being all literary and stuff, it’s how I think of him. I hate saying this, but, “It’s what Ric would have wanted.”
Despite his humble, proletarian lifestyle, Ric recognized closet elitism even in himself. Before he contracted the prostate cancer that ended his life in 2008, he confessed to having another life-threatening disease: “terminal cool.” (Now, I am about to quote from the first line of one of his poems at the beginning of my own sentence. Do I capitalize the first word or not? He didn’t. He didn’t even capitalize the first person singular pronoun! Nominative case. Ric didn’t graduate college, wasn’t a good student in high school either. He was dyslexic. Introducing him to a group of English teachers once, G. Lynn Nelson called him “one of our failures.” (Even As We Speak, p. 100) He couldn’t even spell his own name!) Having devised a way to temporarily avoiding my capitalization problem I proceed thus: Note these lines from “Terminal Cool” (Stark Naked, p. 47):
in the final stages of this cruel affliction
the diseased are often the last to know
how disfigured their demeanor has become
with me
it was not until my friends started talking through the door
and wore flu masks
...
not until then
did i bother to consult a mirror and see the result
of an unchecked case of skepticism
the face
once eager and receptive
had lost all expression
every trace of wonder and delight
had sloughed off
constant analysis had narrowed the eyes
...
We elitists (closeted or not) often suffer quietly from terminal cool. We are inclined to avoid public foolishness and spontaneity in ourselves and others. We prefer analyzing life to enjoying it, explanations to experiences, and decorum to delight. We always explain that we don’t watch much television. We do not sing. And we miss out on so much life.
Ric wrote a song in the 1960s -- “The Dirty Word Song” -- that the closet elitist in me finds entirely too unsophisticated. And way uncool. He calls it a children’s song, but that’s no excuse. Its basic idea is that the words we call dirty, the ones we allow to shock and offend us, are harmless at worst and may well serve a useful function. One stanza goes: “Wouldn’t it be awful if people didn’t swear, / And when ya bang your finger ya jes’ give a silent prayer. / If suddenly the dirty words all were clean / Would the poetry improve in the men’s latrine? / Dirty words, dirty words, be glad we got ‘em / Real dirty words like ...... bottom!” And (in other stanzas) “doggy pooh” and “potty” and “pooper”. (Stark Naked, p. 7) I hate that cute little ditty on oh so many levels -- apostrophied words like “‘cause” and “‘bout”, and supposed slang like “gonna” and “gotta” and - gag! - “ya”, and those strings of ..................... -- but it speaks the truth. The last stanza identifies the real dirty words “like hate and war”. And that’s great, but could ya jes’ find some way t’do what ya do, without cheesy rhyme and ..... doggy pooh?
I hate that.
But there’s also this: “The Dirty Word Song” is published in the 1969 section of poems in Stark Naked in ’69 and ’79, the section that seems “awkward and embarrassing” to the author, the ones of which he writes, “I can’t tell you how many times I winced over these songs and poems, appalled, asking myself: “Could I have written this?” (p. 1) And yet, here’s “The Dirty Word Song”. When I read it and find it awkward and embarrassing myself, I can see it: the disfigured demeanor, the unchecked skepticism, the absence of wonder and delight. Terminal Cool.
I love that.
Ric popped our elitist bubbles! He did it not by pointing at us but by standing alongside us and holding up a mirror. The anti-elitist in me loves that! And I love it when Ric assaults propriety and decorum and says “the brown word.” Out loud. In a poem. That I can then read. Out loud. In class.
Language, I have always believed, should be judged solely by its effectiveness in communicating what one person wants to communicate. People don’t necessarily cuss because they don’t have big enough vocabularies. The best word in a given situation is not the longest word or the most sophisticated one. It is the one that works best.
As in Ric’s poem about being with his good friend whose too young son has died:
i will be your wailing wall man friend
lean on me and rail against the insanity
of life / death
we have lost one of our sons old soldier
hold on tight -- hammer your fist -- shout your curses
shit!
tell me how it was when you last saw him
your golden boy
wild hair flying -- king of his own mountain
... (Stark Naked, p. 44)
I don’t care how big your vocabulary is. Could there be a better word?
People ride buses and pick their noses and eat scrambled eggs and drive clunkers in Ric Masten’s poetry. And they say shit and yell at their kids and get embarrassed. And they giggle and grin and dance. They use the language I hear around me every day, and they are fine with that.
I love that.
I love the ways Ric bursts the sacrosanct bubbles of elitists and sophisticates (such as your present author) and pricks the prevailing presumptuousness of certain prudish proponents of propriety. (I also love alliteration.) And I love the way he stubbornly refuses both to embrace simplistic solutions and to stop dancing.
In many circles, Ric is best known for his song, “Let It Be a Dance”. It is a clear expression of this refusal to, well, get dressed or get off the bus. Consider these excerpts:
a child is born the old must die
a time for joy a time to cry
take it as it passes by
and let it be a dance
the morning star comes out at night
without the dark there can be no light
and if nothing’s wrong then nothing’s right
so let it be a dance
let the sun shine let it rain
share the laughter bare the pain
and round and round we go again
so let it be a dance
(Ric Masten Speaking. Watsonville, CA: Papier-Mache Press, 1990, p. 137-138)
Ric repeatedly refuses to deny the darkness and death that accompany our passage through life, and yet he likewise refuses not to experience the light and the delight that travel with us as well. Ya gotta luv it that his last collection of poems, collected over the last years of his terminal prostrate cancer is titled Going Out Dancing! (Boston: Skinner House Books, 2008)
I love that.
Still another expression of that same powerful idea and, if I had to choose, my favorite of all Ric’s poems is “The Great Escape”. (The Deserted Rooster. Carmel, CA: Sunflower Ink, 1982, p. 53) I think of this poem as a recognition that it is fun, on occasion, to imagine jumping off the bus we’re on and running away. It is fun to dream of a kind of life where everything is roses and sunflowers.
perhaps the good life
the full life
is nothing more
than every once in a while
pulling yourself through a hole
in the roof
standing triumphantly
looking down with a
hot damn!
and then around
with an
oh shit!
I love that in oh so many ways.
Reading and responding to “On This Bus” takes me on a ride through the ideas and memories and life and writings of Ric Masten, and I love that. I love it that the poem starts and ends so abruptly and leaves me wondering what’s next. I love it that it puts me on a bus with everybody else in the world, including Ric and even those folks I’m not so sure about. I love it that it strips me naked, revealing the closeted elitism that I much prefer to hide. I love it that it offends certain precious proprieties with its nakedness and its “my god” and reminds me of lots of other shit Ric throws out there. I love it that Ric makes life’s bus ride a dance.
And I love this:
In a 1977 publication (Speaking Poems. Boston, Beacon Press: 1977, p. 83 and 95) the words to “Let It Be a Dance” include these lines in the third stanza:
let the sun shine let it rain
share the laughter bear the pain
and round and round we go again
so let it be a dance
But in 1990, in Ric Masten Speaking, the line appears this way: “share the laughter bare the pain.” (Italics mine, as they say) Now I like to think that the 1990 version, appearing as it does after Stark Naked and “On This Bus” is a purposeful improvement that Ric made. Then again, it may have been what he meant all along because God knows he couldn’t spell. Then again, it could be a simple typo. I just don’t know.
I love that, too.
NOTE:
I just couldn’t help myself. And I really did leave some things out. He wrote a poem about not hesitating to sit on the toilet while his wife was in the bathtub right next to him because she knew how full of crap he was. He wrote one addressed to Sleep as if she were his mistress and “oh how i hate to leave you in the morning!” And I haven’t even seen Going Out Dancing!
oh thank god
it just occurred to me
he could have called it
Goin’ Out Dancin’
Are here any books of Masten poetry in our library?
ReplyDeleteNDB
This is probably my favorite response so far. It made me want to read more of his work. Fortunately, somebody reminded me to look in the library, and yes, there are quite a few of his poetry collections there. Most of them are marked with the status "Library use only" though, except for Let It Be A Dance.
ReplyDeleteI definitely enjoy the personal spin on this poem, along with Ric Masten's other works. I find the "bear" "bare" scenario from "Let It Be A Dance" to be the MOST interesting, due to his dyslexia and changes he purposefully made. It is almost his little way of keeping the reader guessing or "puzzling" over his works. Like Lindsi mentioned, it makes me want to read more of his works. Maybe, it is because i enjoy making the "is that all there is?" face.
ReplyDeleteSo, Lindsi & Jaime, those are personal responses to a personal response, right?
ReplyDeleteNDB
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with Jamie and Linsi, this response has piqued my interest the most. It really made me want to get to know Ric Masten and his literary work. I can certainly feel the passion that the author has for “Ric” and that makes me curious.
ReplyDeleteNDB,
ReplyDeletethey absolutely are!:-)
This response was my favorite also. The positive nature of it appeals to me and makes me 'love it' too. Makes me wish I could've met such an interesting person whose words leave you wondering why and wanting more. Even one word that could be a typo makes you think. 'Bear' or 'bare'?
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this personal response of "On This Bus" by Ric Masten. It has a positive outline to it with "I love that" after every paragraph. He took even some aspects of the poem that could have seemed more negative to most readers and turned it around to a positive view with the "I love that" after each point he made.
ReplyDeleteHe reflected on what Ric Masten was trying to portray to his readers but also most importantly reflected on his 'personal' opinion leaving it as an interesting analysis to read.
This is probly my favorite response so far as well. I love how the writer refered to other Ric Masten poems and brought to light his honesty and relatability.
ReplyDeleteEmmy Vinson
This was my favorite beause you can relate to it. It was also a lot more interesting to read.
ReplyDeleteDana Ferguson
I definitely enjoyed reading this response. I feel like I now know his personality better and I’m anxious to read more of his poems. I also agree that it’s something I can relate to as well.
ReplyDeleteMaybe all of the positive response to the personal response reflects the way we prefer to see literature: as an observation about life. I think we're just more comfortable with thinking that way. Is it because we have so often been asked how a text relates to our own lives or because our teachers haven't been able to think up better questions that "Did you like it? Why?"
ReplyDeleteIt's easier to write about our response because we're mostly writing about ourselves. But this personal response that we are reading goes beyond saying "I love that" over and over again. It gives evidence and examples. (Is there a difference?) I think that's another reason we respond to it so positively. It's full of concrete evidence from the text, from the respondents research, and from his own experience.
So I'm finding myself making a list of reasons we seem to like this kind of response best. Dana, I'm asking myself why we can relate to it, what makes it more interesting to read. Here's what I'm coming up with:
1) it's familiar territory; 2) it's largely about ourselves; 3) it states a clear opinion in a positive way; 4) it uses well-chosen concrete evidence and uses it well; 5) it uses repetition effectively; 6) its syntax and diction are conversational; 6) the respondent's tone is easy / comfortable...
So, is that the beginning of an aesthetic analysis of a personal response?
NDB
P.S. I heard Dr. B say once that one of the things that people responding to literature do is to problematize, i.e. to ask questions about the text that someone else may not think to ask. Always making problems where there weren't any before. That's what such people do. One of those questions is "As opposed to what?"
I agree with the mahority here, I enjoy this responce because it allows for personal opinion and self expression. The author is very person with this essay. He is some what fee to say what he thinks about Ric and his works and that is not always positive but we get a person sence of work out of the essay. The author agrees and disagrees with Ric's poetry and explains hisself completly.
ReplyDelete